Well actually now I can claim it to be ‘a perfect match’
Well it is not really a claim.
It ‘just is’.
Take a look at the notation Ed Witten was using.
Scroll down the link..look closely, compare, read my explanations, you will begin to understand exactly the same notation in the SS SATOR SQUARE was used as we find the modern ‘alchemist theorists’ like Ed Witten does today.
IT ALL FITS
It really does, some of you will see how sweet it is.
Wow, was my right brain activated or what?
THE SATOR SQUARE CAN BE MERGED WITH TWISTOR STRING THEORY AND SUPERSYMMETRY
Sadukan I guess this is where your + and – come into the equation.
expressed as PT+ and PT- in the Twistor String Theory
but how can that be?
About 2000 years separates these two events.
Well I do have a good idea of how it came to pass?
First Roger Penrose proposes Twistor Theory, and later Ed Witten building on Twistor Theory, added the 5 String Theories, and along comes the archetypal sleuth who started his journey using the number 4, follows 4 numbers, 11 2 5 8, takes the flat 2D Sator Square and starts to WEAVE a few knots using swastikas, all the way to Ed Witten himself?
Very very important to note that I mentioned only 8 squares were unaccounted for in the SATOR SQ …
Corresponding to the ALPHA and the OMEGA, the beginning and the end, the A and O is associated with `jesus`, and these 8 vowels are in fact on the SATOR SQ. positioned in a similar architecture we find time and again, even in the LHC at CERN, which are in fact 8 `mirrors`, or going way back, the morning and evening 8 pointed Star of Venus.
JC and CJ would be proud.
Joseph Campbell and Carl Jung
Well I have an appointment on Monday with my shrink.
Yup his initials are JC too!
He happens to be Jewish, like Ed, he has a PhD of course, so maybe my buddy JC can deliver this message for me to Ed Witten himself.
I am sure Ed might be interested in how I joined the dots.
MEME and MEW3
NOW FIND THE LETTERS MEW3 ON THIS PLATE.
START IN THE TOP LEFT MOVING COUNTERCLOCKWISE
M E W 3
See the letters?
M E W 3
MEMEs and TEMEs
I found this quite interesting, another nice fit to the SATOR SQuare.
great video on Ted Tv.
Now if you have started to recognize that there might be an association between the letters M and E and W and the number 3 , this next video about MEMEs just about seals it.
Interesting, in this video she also talks about progressing to the TEMEs, and the SATOR Square fullfills both the MEME structure and the TEMEs that we recognize as the ‘4xEs’ move out to the third rank from the center out to the four fixed corners, represented by the ‘4xT’.
The main reason I mentioned it is because in the SATOR SQuare there are 4xE or E, E, E, E.
And I feel that it does not take a wild imagination to match MEME with the EEEE that we find in the SATOR SQuare.
Because with rotations of MEME, using rotations and reflections using xyz, we can arrive at letters/shapes that look like MEW3 or EEEE.
And as mentioned we have 4xE or MEME and 4xT or TEME represented on the SATOR SQuare.
Along with the N in the center, these eight letters forms the CROSS within the sator square.
And please note that as we move out from N, we have ET, ET, ET and ET.
ETs in four directions?
“variation + selection + heredity = design or evolution without the aid of mind”
WHY do MEMEs spread?
Humans represent the MEMEs or is that “me me”?
Is that why we now squawk like the seegulliblies that we have become, “mine mine mine”?
why we need to learn about the MEME before it becomes our master?
Mnemonics, Catch-Phrases, Totems and Icons
A Meme-Based Approach to Oral Traditional Theory
http://journal.oraltradition.org/files/ … /Drout.pdf
http://hubpages.com/hub/Co-Mingling-of- … ging-Times
CLEARLY THE SATOR SQUARE IS A RIGHT BRAIN MEME BASED ALGORITHM
a thread all about ‘M’
As the names suggest, some of these string theories were thought to be related to each other. In the early 1990s, string theorists discovered that some relations were so strong that they could be thought of as an identification.
But the underlying prose and poetry of the creation itself IS expressed in the nomenclature…..clearly linking the past to the present…..followed by a wow!
* When Witten named M-theory, he did not specify what the “M” stood for, presumably because he did not feel he had the right to name a theory which he had not been able to fully describe. According to Witten himself, “‘M’ can stand for either ‘magic’, ‘mystery’, or ‘matrix’, according to taste.” According to the BBC/TLC documentary Parallel Universes, the M stands for “membrane”. Other suggestions by people such as Michio Kaku, Michael Duff and Neil Turok in that documentary are “mother” (as in “mother of all theories”), and “master” theory.
Cynics have noted that the M might be an upside down “W”, standing for Witten. Others have suggested that for now, the “M” in M-theory should stand for Missing or Murky. The various speculations as to what “M” in “M-theory” stands for are explored in the PBS documentary based on Brian Greene’s book The Elegant Universe.
* The name M-theory is slightly ambiguous. It can be used to refer to both the particular eleven-dimensional theory which Witten first proposed, or it can be used to refer to a kind of theory which looks in various limits like the various string theories. Ashoke Sen has suggested that more general theory could go by the name U-theory, which might stand for Ur, Uber, Ultimate, Underlying, or perhaps Unified. (It might also stand for U-duality, which is both a reference to Sen’s own work and a kind of particle physics pun.)
M-theory in the following descriptions refers to the more general theory, and will be specified when used in its more limited sense.
I have my own ideas about the origin of ‘M’ theory
We can find it on that plate from 5000 BCE
the M theory
the MEME theory
it all fits the SATOR SQUARE
Swastika is the KEY of Universal Movement, forming part of an ancient vortex theory, along with phi and pi and the Maltese cross.
“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”
Nature cannot be hidden, only VEILeD with fantastic narratives that defy nature.