703 wrote:
Now if I could find out who is behind it and WHY it has been a secret. I MAY have found something new.I just skipped over it briefly a few minutes ago.Knights Templar=173(a numerical anagram of 137)
That is a good site 703.
Some great info linking the Knights Templar to the severed head of St. John the Baptist.
As discussed in this blog.
THE TEMPLAR HEAD
” a great head of gilded silver, most beautiful, in the image of a woman. Inside were two head bones, wrapped in white linen with another red cloth around it. “
On an attached label is written “CAPUT LVIIIm” ~ “HEAD 58”
White linen with a red cloth around it?
Friday the 13th?
What year did the fortunes change for the Knights Templar 703?
1307
What god / goddess is associated with Friday >>> Freitag >>> Freya?
On Friday, October 13, 1307 (a date sometimes incorrectly linked with the origin of the Friday the 13th superstition) Philip ordered de Molay and scores of other French Templars to be simultaneously arrested.
The Templars were charged with numerous heresies and tortured to extract false confessions of blasphemy. These confessions, despite having been obtained under duress, caused a scandal in Paris.
After more bullying from Philip, Pope Clement then issued the bill Pastoralis Praeeminentiae on November 22, 1307, which instructed all Christian monarchs in Europe to arrest all Templars and seize their assets.
…also there is a big deal connecting the number 58 to this head, and then later 1158.
…see the pattern?
…what two numbers are missing?
…what does the ratio 8/5 represent in ‘sacred math’?
…is it a coincidence 5 + 8 = 13 … and 13 is the next number in the Fibonacci sequence?
…yes the matrix is quite the riddle?
namaste
Raphael
worth having a look at;
- TEMPLAR FORMULA: “CAPUT LVIIIM” Engraved on a silver
- The A to Z of the Knights Templar: A Guide to Their …
- Holy Blood, Holy Grail Illustrated Edition: The Secret …
- Arcadia Discussion Zone • View topic – The Templars head and
- Mysteries of The Templars
The Baphomet A Feminine Origin?
_________________
Science and Religion Reconciled with a little help from my friends 
In the kabbalah “137” is a very special number, have a look! And the number ok KBLH itself. Point of encounter, Janus who rests.
)*
I think you’ll find his posts interesting:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=27927
Ciao
)*
thanks for the link,
there is much information on that thread,
gracia
rafa
I first heard about the head of John the Baptist listening to this guy named Josh Reeves on a site called The Global Reality. He suggested that in a spiritual sense “they” are trying to put the head back on John the Baptist. I have been learning a lot of commercial law lately, and there is this guy named Winston Shrout of Solutions in Commerce who suggests that John the Baptist was the “testator” of the old testament, meaning, his blood had to be shed to pay for the past debts of the Hebrew people under the Mosaic Law. John was the one who baptised Jesus for the Aaronic Priesthood, but Jesus himself was the testator of the new testament, a new contract with the people, and of the Melchisedek Priesthood. I am thinking that Jesus was the last supposed to be baptised under the Aaronic, as a sacrifice, and then, when his blood was shed, the story is that he paid for all debts into the future for the Hebrew people, and which also extended to the gentiles of the world. Something I notice about the law these days in almost every country, is that it is generally private in nature, and related to the Vatican, and resembles Mosiac Law, because it is not really the old unwritten common law of life liberty and property, but more statutes and ordinances, and there are tonnes of them. So one of my theory is that the statutory law that we are under today is a reflection of Mosaic Law and this is related to “putting the head back on John the Baptist” in some sense. Especially America, seems to follow a progression of the story in the bible, from the old testament, to the new testament, and now back in time again to the old testament. Maybe, lol.
maybe, I agree
both the old and new bibles are testaments to the inevitable change that is always inferred by prophecy.
what if bibles are indeed reflections, rotations and translations, the physics of the human condition, a numbers game translated into letters and put into text.
…and something gets lost in the translation?
…because the house takes its cut from each human participant?
maybe?
namaste
in this interesting mirror overlay of DaV’s LS note the central pyramid with ‘black’ figure inside and three biblical colors, also chalice/grail on each side (but can be seen on left in single shot) but ALSO note the skulls on each side about halfway over each group of apostles … the skull represents J the B … and one guy thinks he was the hubby of Mary the M, and when he died, Jesus being the next of kin married her as he would have to as a Levitical priest and through Judaic law …
So you want to ‘diagnose a manipulation’ of the LS using a mirror overlay?
And this is not even the original LS you are manipulating?
And then you start with heresy, the ‘he said, she said’ nonsense?
What is your point?
To try prove a literal Jesus true, using whatever means available?
Btw the history lessons I have prepared start at about 10,000 BCE.
Considering that the Jesus narrative started about 2000 years ago, it appears you have missed about 10,000 years of classes.
Here is a good place to start, it will bring you up to speed, how the speed of light in meters/second was embedded into the Great Pyramid long long ago, for us to figure out. What does Jesus have to do with building the Great Pyramid? I consider the Great Pyramid a bigger mystery, in fact I can see proof of this mystery.
https://kachina2012.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/the-sacred-cut-by-tons-brunes/
namaste
This is, officially, the most retarded thing I have ever seen in writing. We only have ten digits to work from, put three of them together, and you can form any number of ridiculous connections by way of anagram.
I would be more than willing to illustrate how IGNORANT you are?
are you willing to find out that ye are really quite blind to the obvious?