“…ROTAS/SATOR Square is a RIGHT BRAIN mnemonic for an ancient vortex theory that centered around the SWASTIKA”

Wow :idea:
Another breakthrough.

I had a link posted to my blog.

I finally got around to checking out the site.
The site of Alex Petty. 

It took me 20 seconds to match up the SATOR SQUARE with a VORTEX Math grid that can be found at that link above.
Inspiration is like that, I imagine.

Alex Petty who did the work at that site, used Marko Rodin’s Vortex ideas, to arrive at his grid pattern that I have cropped below, and can be found at that link in its entirety.

And even better, Alex is a real life buddy of the fella who did the work on the CODE 144 Site re: Coral Castle


Everything is falling into place quite nicely.
As expected. :mrgreen:
Cha cha cha cha

And of course I still ‘feel’ it is a match for Twistor String Theory.
I really should bring ole’ Roger Penrose and Edward Witten into the fray now.
Those guys need to pick mi asymmetrical brain…
What can I say?

So the LETTERS, the designations, used in Twistor Theory also match have you noticed?
Take a look below, we can clearly see a match between an OLD WORLD theory and something brand NEW.

WE also now have numerical correspondences…and of course we still need to see how the 4 AGES Model fits…because it got me this far… :wink:

Again folks what ole’ Raphael has accomplished using the swastika as symbolic guide and guru, helping me to remember, is establish that the SATOR/ROTAS SQUARE is a RIGHT BRAIN alpha-numeric puzzle, structured as a MNEMonic to help activate the mind.

An alchemical 5×5 magic square that the LEFT BRAIN ‘experts’ weaned on modern science (void of any Neo-Platonic alchemy or philosophy) could NOT quite figure out and understand its place in our evolving history.

However here I am bringing a TRUTH to the forefront by attempting to bridge/fuse the LEFT and RIGHT mind.
It took me about 6 years following an archetypal path?
Is that a rhetorical question?

Using clues found in BOTH science AND religion, building block clues offered by both evolution and creation.
What kind of narrative can we put together using both perspectives?

And I do feel that approach is what assisted my original intent to suss out those basic truths that unify all beliefs.

Again a reminder, my original intent 6+ years ago began as a quest to simply find the common denominators that all beliefs MUST share in, the intersections that do occur between people, events, places, experience, all are fractals which MUST in some way contribute too,  make up the whole of unity.

I have firmly established now that the ancients as far back as 79 AD had a THEORY in place, that today we are just re-discovering using LEFT brained math and physics, etc.

Marko, Alex and me have now shown that there is another way to understanding swirly, twirly swastika like objects.
I happened to arrive at the same place studying primarily ‘archetypes’.

I have thus PROVED that the ancients indeed had a vortex theory in place that got buried and has remained VEILeD for quite some time.
An ancient vortex theory connected to the much maligned swastika.

I am proud to say I only have grade 12 education plus life experience.
And I could have joined these dots with much leSS education, I feel this NEEDs to be recognized.
IF my mind body and soul had not been misled by those whose would prefer I remain IGNORANT.

Thus I feel confident and cocky (born in the year of the Chinese rooster), still strutting and contending that the 4 AGES Model I have recovered is a model for BOTH everything small, MICRO/quantum, i.e. the path of an electron AND everything big or MACRO, i.e. a star’s orbit,  and of course as I have maintained for years, it is a model for precession of the equinoxes too…

What was the source of the SS, the SATOR Square?
Evidently it was the ROTAS Square before it was ‘reversed’ at some point.
What was the source of the ROTAS Square?

Is this 5×5 magic square a KEY to solving GRAVITY and all those mysteries that were CREATED after the facts of life, the many patterns that seem to defy time, space and motion, look ago identified in nature itself?

Below we see  how the same letters are used in both the modern TWISTOR THEORY and the 2000 year old? … SATOR/ROTAS SQUARE.


I quickly wrote down the important particulars along with the words PUBLIC DOMAIN.

We have already noted how nicely it meshes with Alex/Marko’s Vortex Based Mathematics…

NOW please note also how the LETTERs used in the ROTAS Square match up with Roger Penrose’s and Ed Witten’s TWISTOR THEORY.
Where E can be rotated into an M, W, or 3 or reflected as the same E, M, W, and 3

that could make 4 or 8

in the reflections they do not really change.
we are simply offered the same 4 shapes.

HOWEVER the N can be rotated through x,y,z, as first a rotation to a Z or 2 and then as a reflection as S or 5.

Hmm essentially the N can thus be seen as ‘2 5’ ?

Hello Marko welcome to Raphael’s version of the COSMIC BLENDER.

\mathbb{PT}^+ \simeq \mathrm{SU}(2,2)/\left[ \mathrm{SU}(2,1) \times \mathrm{U}(1) \right]

In \mathbb{M}^c, it is the case that positive and negative frequency solutions cannot be locally separated. However, this is possible in twistor space.

  • \mathbb{M}^c corresponds to the subspace of \mathbf{R}\mathbb{P}^5 corresponding to vectors of zero norm. This is conformally compactified Minkowski space.
  • \mathbb{PT} is a 3D complex manifold corresponding to projective twistor space.
  • \mathbb{PT}^+ is the subspace of \mathbb{PT} corresponding to projective twistors with positive norm (the sign of the norm, but not its absolute value is projectively invariant). This is a 3D complex manifold.
  • \mathbb{PN} is the subspace of \mathbb{PT} consisting of null projective twistors (zero norm). This is a real-complex manifold (i.e., it has 5 real dimensions, with four of the real dimensions having a complex structure making them two complex dimensions).
  • \mathbb{PT}^- is the subspace of \mathbb{PT} of projective twistors with negative norm.

\mathbb{M}^c, \mathbb{PT}^+, \mathbb{PN} and \mathbb{PT}^- are all homogeneous spaces of the conformal group.

\mathbb{M}^c admits a conformal metric (i.e., an equivalence class of metric tensors under Weyl rescalings) with signature (+++−). Straight null rays map to straight null rays under a conformal transformation and there is a unique canonical isomorphism between null rays in \mathbb{M}^c and points in \mathbb{PN} respecting the conformal group.







Wow, is this possible EVIDENCE of a Design put into place that we are being LEAD to?
A script that has already been written?

We are merely fulfilling potential?
The alchemist lord works in strange ways?

And the best part from my perspective?
I was scripted in to ‘recover’ this piece of the puzzle. :lol:

YES I did notice that the A and O have not been accounted for.BUT DID YOU NOTICE THAT THOSE ARE THE ONLY 2 VOWELS.

Is that where the THEORY of JESUS comes in?



The Alpha and the Omega?


Using the Pyramid Cipher, “KNIGHTS TEMPLAR” can be encoded as “BNOHVSE SPZTGCM.” By using one or more filler letters, the cipher might look like “BNOHVSEOSPZTGCMY” with ‘J’ and ‘Q’ as encoded fillers (‘O’ and ‘Y’). Remember that ‘I’ can also be encoded as ‘O.’ The letters can be substituted with numbers to create a number cipher: “2-13-14-8-21-18-5 18-15-25-19-7-3-12.” After adding the ‘J’ and ‘Q’ fillers, the cipher would look like “2-13-14-8-21-18-5-14-18-15-25-19-7-3-12-24.” Knowing that numbers 1-25 represent the letters, a cipher message could mix in additional numbers up to 50 or 100. The person doing the decoding would remove all numbers above 25, leaving the real cipher numbers: “33-2-13-49-28-14-41-8-26-21-37-29-18-28-48-5” = “2-13-14-8-21-18-5” = “KNIGHTS.”

wow great huge huge clues given here.

NOTE how the CENTER square in ALL of the above ciphers is either connected to the LETTER N or the number 13. :idea:
Well I do like how the last 3 digits in KNIGHTS = 21-18-5
For some reason my gaze has been on these numbers 112?58 , the golden ratio has been my guide for some time now. :wink:


(and this is IMPORTANT to note: the ROTAS SQUARE reportedly came first.)

Here is a cosmic game reduced to a magic square.
IF the middle square ‘N’ can be rotated and reflected into a Z, 2, 5 or ‘S’, then what if we are playing a cosmic game of tic tac dough?

i.e. please note we have two ‘S’ perched in the corners of the SATOR Square.
HOW do we get three or THRICE in a ROW along the NW/SE diagonal?
Ignore the ‘R’ that separates the ‘S’s for a moment, I will explain when I learn how to ‘transition’ between the different sizes of magic squares, thus reducing the 5×5 magic square (associated with Mars) down to a 4×4 magic square (Jupiter), and then eventually down to the 3×3 Lo Shu represented by Saturn.

this image of the *ROTAS* Square might help us solve what to do with those two ‘R’s that stop us from forming THRICE ‘SSS’ in a Row.
Currently along the SW/NE axis, we have the letters SRNRS.
Hey Ezekiel does a ‘wheels within wheels’ analogy serve us well in this situation?

In the above image of the ROTAS wheel, rotate the wheel in the above image that contains the two Ps and the two Rs, by 45 degrees, until they are hidden BEHIND the CROSS formed by the horizontal and vertical ‘FIXED’ cross displaying the words ‘TENET’.

AH HA!!!
Now we have only the letters S_N_S visible along the SW/NE axis and along the NW/SE axis only the letters R_N_R are visible?
Are you still following along?
The 2P and 2R are hidden behind the CROSS.
The 2PaiR have taken refuge somewhere behind the 4 letter E’s and 4T’s
Hiding behind the ETs?
Hope you can see that?

More associations you need to know re: 4 ET’s = 4 Evangelists who are definitely a part of the architecture of the FIXED CROSS represented by the 4 FIXED astrological signs, that we find on CARD X of the Tarot….which happens to be called Ezekiel’s Wheel. :wink:
These 4 FIXED zodiac signs have 4 stars identified by the Persians as far back as 2500-3000 BC.
These 4 stars were called both the 4 WATCHERS and the 4 ROYAL STARS.
These 4 stars or evangelists actually form a CROSS in the heavens, and within that CROSS we can position the GOLDEN SPIRAL.


All of which can be associated also to the DENDERA Zodiac and the golden spiral (phi)
:arrow: https://kachina2012.wordpress.com/2009/0 … yal-stars/


But try to get the ‘N’ in the center to look like an ‘S’ without reversing the two ‘ends’ during the same process…
PLEASE NOTE: Every time you manage to get the center to look like a ‘S’ the two ends resemble the letter ‘N’.
You need to understand how mirrors work to understand the above analogies.
Specifically to understand the reflection we see in the mirror is along the z-axis NOT the y-axis.
remember the lesson by King Richard Feynman.

Is this the MAGIC we should or should NOT attempt to exploit, or tamper with?
Should we be conCERNed about Never A Straight Answer, (infiltrated by ‘Freemasons’) running the show?

keep reading please, especially until you get to the video below, not much further to go…
ALL OF THE ABOVE will soon make sense.

We know the following to be true, echos heard in the Vatican:
S = Sanctus
SS = Spiritus Sanctus = Holy Spirit = St. Peter and St. Paul

IF we can get the middle ‘N’ to resemble an ‘S’ then we have THRICE SSS
Santus! Sanctus! Sanctus!

So why does Holy-wood use 555 / SSS as their favorite telephone exchange in the movies?
E.T. phone home?

Now let’s take a look at the Marko Rodin logo.
You only need to watch the first 10 seconds of this video to appreciate where I am headed with this thought….

Please note the numbers 3, 6, 9 in this Rodin video.
These are the legendary/rumored TESLA numbers.
Please note that when the 3 and 6 are positive the 9 is negative.
And when the 9 is positive the 3 and 6 are negative.
NOTE: how the values change when the ‘crossover’ occurs.
A ‘crossover’ that appears just above the numbers 4 and 5.
A ‘crossover’ that might be related to a fella I stumbled across on these forums, who has calculated a musical 4.5 crossover frequency based on the Pythagorean Lambdoma.
256 notes placed onto a 16×16 grid

And of course the ‘coincidences’ do not end there.
The word nibiru translates to ‘to crossover or crossing’.

So what happens if we should align the 3 6 9 to be all positive values or all negative ones?

Thus clearly the magic of Tesla’s ‘3 6 9’ is somehow connected to the Pope shouting out…

“Sanctus! Sanctus! Sanctus!”

Holy! Holy! Holy!
Shakti! Shakti! Shakti!

Why always ‘3’ knocks on the door, why do Freemasons do things in threes?
And more importantly why are these THRICE meSSengerS always associated with ‘SOUND’? :wink:

I don’t get it? :lol:

Clearly the SATOR/ROTAS SQUARE is part of a much higher knowledge attained, condensed into a mnemonic.
These magic squares are WINDOWS we can use to look through as we plod forward, with a bruised big TOE in search of that elusive Theory OF Everything.

And if all of above has not made it OBVIOUS what these magic squares give us insight to is the following.

When you folks discuss polarity flips and reversals, don’t you think you should educate yourselves about the facts of life?

i.e. most folks begin their alphabets with learning about the ABCs of life….

I however start at the other end of the alphabet constructed by our sheeple brains.
The swastika and me apparently swim against the mainstream flow.
I toy with my awareness by trying to learn about z y x, and guess what w is?
And xyz-axis of power, is the language that physics would use to explain flips and reversals.


And the middle letter of a 25 letter alphabet (where I=J as in the SATOR cipher) is the reverse of the letter W, the letter M.
And the 13th letter (13=4) of the 26 letter alphabet is the letter M?
Thus M = 4?
And the 14th letter (14=5) is the letter N?
Thus N = 5?

But the SATOR SQUARE places the N in the center not the M.
I love how it all fits.
E = M, W and 3 (4 permutations)
N = Z, S, 5, 2 (5 permutations)
(a sixth if you include a ‘reverse’ N which of course looks like a Roman numeral VI = reverse N.)

I love the way the cosmos was put together.
fookin’ amazing how the ‘conicidences’ ALL fit.

no coincidences



Thus a seeker will ALWAYS find de signs in the design, that each of ewe and I AM are weaving together.
A dance between left and right, up and down, in and out, centered or on the periphery, dead or alive.


aianawa aianawa nui wrote:
am emotionally happy .1 tear, R A mean anything ? .lol

Ra Ra Ra
SiS boom go the baa?

the ‘iSiS’ code reveals that the Alpha and the Omega, A + O = 16
16 is very important in how the SabeanS divided up the heavens.

who were the Sabeans?
Semitic/Arabic astrologers/astronomers?


The inhabitants of the ancient kingdom of Sheba in southeastern Arabia, known from the Bible, classical writers, and native inscriptions. The genealogies of Genesis give three pedigrees for Sheba, the eponymous ancestor of the Sabeans, who is variously termed (1) the son of Raamah and the grandson of Cush (Gen. x. 7; I Chron. i. 9; comp. Ezek. xxvii. 22, xxxviii. 13), (2) the son of Joktan and a great-great-great-grandson of Shem (Gen. x. 28; I Chron. i. 22), and (3) the son of Jokshan and a grandson of Abraham by Keturah (Gen. xxv. 3; I Chron. i. 32). There seem, therefore, to have been three stocks of Sabeaus: one in Africa (comp. the Ethiopian city of Saba mentioned by Strabo, “Geography,” p. 771), and the other two in Arabia. Of the latter one is connected with the story of Abraham, and the other with that of the kingdom localized by Gen. x. 30, including the Joktanites generally, and extending “from Mesha, as thou goest unto Sephar, a mount of the east.” In Job vi. 19 the Sabeans are mentioned in close association with the Temeans, an Ishmaelite stock (Gen. xxv. 15) that dwelt in Arabia (Isa. xxi. 14; comp. Jer. xxv. 23-24).

:arrow: http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view. … 0&letter=S

And note the position of the ‘four 2 5’ in the SATOR SQUARE below.

WHY? :wink:

Maybe just maybe because Marko Rodin calls 25 the COSMIC BLENDER.
:arrow: viewtopic.php?p=229176#p229176




Some time ago, I found a web site called the Illuminatus Observor and have been studying it without stop. I have read and re-read this site over and over. I don’t have a math or physics background but tend to grasp the linguistics. So I do struggle along figuring out the math. His website is a study of the English language and how the elite have encoded it with certain esoteric truths. These truths are only known but to a very few. Once you start to delve into this site, you will find that the truth has been right in front of our faces the whole time. Our English language has been encoded to conceal and yet reveal all of the truth you would ever want or need.

:arrow: There is another person whose knowledge aided me in this and his name is Raphael :mrgreen: and he has a web site at https://kachina2012.wordpress.com/ I personally do not know either of these two persons yet I am most grateful for their information.

When reading Rapheal’s information, he disclosed that the Celtic Cross could be placed on the Sator Square and rotated as if it were a decoder. I first turned the inner 9 squares 2 notches or squares and it revealed from the top middle down – TRN RT (RIGHT), OPNE OR OPEN, then the ROTAS I took to mean the wheel, simply going to the root of the word. So I then took the outer wheel (all of the outside squares) and rotated it 1 complete turn. This flipped the puzzle, thus creating the ROTAS SQUARE. I am not sure which came first though, the chicken or the egg. Whether it’s a SATOR OR A ROTAS SQUARE, I don’t know.


:arrow: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/fo … ead=170038


MihrYazd wrote:

Raphael have you checked out this little gem, The Mithraic Origin and Meanings of the Rotas-Sator Square

a quote from the book regarding 3+1


I would love to get a copy of that book.
currently searching for one
is there a version available online?

BTW that book only has ’52’ pages.

and ’52’ is significant for many reasons.
besides the fact the Rotas/Sator square has ’25’ squares.

this next post below, showing two images :idea: lead me to this book that has only 52 pages re: the 25 Rotas (came first) Squares
how how how unifying, for a lack of a better word.
coincidence does not fit.

And the truth be known, before the more popular SS (sator square) was the RS (rotas square).



The two images below link the 4 EVANGELISTS/4 Living Creatures/4 Beasts that we find on CARD X of the TAROT containing the CODE 11258, to the SATOR SQUARE… :idea:

the first one depicting the FOUR EVANGELISTS as the FOUR LIVING CREATURES along with the Sator Square.
the second one depicting the Sator Square inside a figure of Christ?, himself inside a star of david/hexagram, and surrounded by those same 4 Creatures now obviously the 4 Fixed Signs of the Zodiac.



did you note the fact that those 4 Living Creatures/Zodiac signs are pulling the ‘wheel/circle’ in a COUNTERCLOCKWISE rotation.
Because precession of the equinoxes means to precess or go backwards, COUNTERCLOCKWISE or Anti-Clockwise…

and the best part, please note the page this gem was found on Lo Shu fans.

it starts on page 258 :lol: :lol:

:lol: could the clues be any more apparent?
gotta love it.


In the gift/donation of Constantine being handed to Pope Sylvester we see what resembles the same architecture as the 4 directions the Sator Square can be read?


KEY 528=Swastika=ancient Spherical Standing Wave Theory
“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”


‘M’ Theory = ‘E’ found @ Temple of Apollo @ DelPhi

MacGyverCanada wrote:
If you want to go deeper down the rabbit hole, so to speak, start learning the basics of M-theory.

M-theory is where we are today in our understanding of fundamental physics. It states that our world is made up of these tiny vibrating packets of energy, called ‘strings’. These strings vibrate not only in our four dimensions (3-dimensional space + time) but also in seven additional dimensions that we can’t percieve. The strings can also unfold into massive sheets, called ‘branes’. In theory, our entire universe could exist as an impossibly thin film on one of these branes. So far it’s all theory; we’re working at a scale that is far too small to observe, and we’re dealing with far more energy than we can work with easily. The solution may lie with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a massive particle accelerator in Europe. One of the goals of the LHC is to smash apart an atom with such incredible force that it causes some of its pieces to enter other dimensions. Welcome to the 21st century, everyone. )

Is science a rabbit hole?
Are we mere mortals coming full or is it fool circle, as the archetypal tarot suggests?

What the modern ‘scientist’ calls ‘M’ theory is actually a perfect fit, for what was studied at the Temple of Apollo. Where was this sacred temple?
In DelPhi … is the phi coincidence or part of the narrative?
Is it true there exists a statue of Apollo with a swastika on his chest?
In a Vienna museum this can be found?
And King Midas who by coincidence has his money in a swiSS bank account, preferred Pan’s pipe’s to Apollo’s lyre?

Lyres were associated with Apollonian virtues of moderation and equilibrium, contrasting the Dionysian pipes which represented ecstasy and celebration.The ‘Lyre’ or ‘Harp’ is the instrument invented by Hermes and given to Apollo his half-brother, who in turn gave it to his son Orpheus, the musician of the Argonauts.

In a Greek myth, the walls of Thebes were said to have been constructed by the skill of a musician called Amphion and his lyre. He played the lyre in such a way that stones were made to move.
Orpheus also had the power to move stones by the playing of his lyre.

Could they use the inaudible SOUNDs of the lyre to LIE to us?

Does perspective or the role of the observer play a role in quantum sleight-of-hand, err I mean physics?
If  I take the letter M and place it in the center of the table, and place 4 people representing the 4 races, represented each by the one of the 4 colors of alchemy, once commonly referred to as the Great Work, at the 4 cardinal positions, at that table, will they all see an M?

NO, the M can be obviously ‘rotated’, caused to SPIN either CW or CCW, using the flick of your swastika wrist, into an E, W, and a 3.

I think ‘M’ theory should be called ‘M E W 3’ Theory, or something like that. TBA
And I feel string theory will evolve into a knotzie theory too, eventually.

‘E’ at Delphi was  SACRED
https://kachina2012.wordpress.com/2008/0 … -1_4_7_10/

Here is the simplest formula yet to be composed in regards to an all encompassing “Theory of Everything”
A simple theory based on ONE elementary particle and only TWO possible directions it can SPIN.
Clockwise CW and CounterClockwise CCW
And most importantly HOW the SPIN is initiated and perpetuated.
IMHO it cannot be made simpler.

And the STANDARD MODEL of the UNIVERSE that has been ‘recovered’ , is yet to be formulated by the eggheads using physics. ‘Recovered’ is far more appropriate than discovered. The long sought after MODEL unveiled by a nobody, using mostly intuition, paSSion and intent.

Here is one of the places ancient ‘M E W 3’ Theory has been recovered.
Samarra Iraq.
https://kachina2012.wordpress.com/catego … milky-way/
The above blog highly suggests the ancients were tuned in to BOTH the biggest and smallest picture.

Digital Sky Survey of the Milky Way

The above image is the Standard Model of the Universe, already surveyed by the experts.
As a non-expert studying many different disciplines, I saw a pattern.

All you need to do is imagine that I can show you how that UNIVERSAL MODEL holds true on EVERY DIMENSION…even for the electron…thus a standard model exists for both the microcosm and the macrocosm.
So in conclusion:
Before there was ‘M’ Theory the ancients had a reverence for ‘E’ Theory.
What is the difference?
Rotate 90 degrees clockwise and E >>> M.
Call it physics?

ALL I want to do is bring people back to a place where you will understand what you already know.
And then I can rest.



KEY 528=Swastika=ancient Spherical Standing Wave Theory
“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”