‘11258’ plus 69 = KEYSTONE = Royal Arch = Meet ME in St. Louis

Here is another book printed prior to the NAZIs adopting the swastika mantra in the 1920s, that I would recommend.
Mostly for its information re: symbols.
I do not agree with all its conclusions, some are quite ‘racist’ and ‘outdated’.
In fact what this information suggests is that it is the intent of the person who is shown this ‘truth’ which determines how it is communicated.
Thus a white racist armed with a bible can twist truth into whatever narrative they so desire.
Are ye ok with the KKK – what kind of putrid narrative filled their vessels?
Or a Freemason armed with a bible, compass, and square might just divide the world up based on their IGNORANT POV.

TAKE a peek:

Download the book:

Once you have acquired access to this book…
Read the entries about the SWASTIKA.

About the Author

Dr. Albert Churchward (1852-1925) was a Mason and member of the Geological Society of London. He is the well-respected author of books delving into the evolution of symbols through history in The Origin and Evolution of Religion, Signs and Symbols of Primordial Man, and The Origin and Evolution of the Human Race. He also collaborated extensively with his brother James Churchward, noted author of The Lost Continent of Mu and an additional series of books about the lost continent.


James and Albert are brothers.
I should have clued in.

I did notice AC sports my former FF badge numbers in his date of birth.
One of the numerical clues that I am following as I time travel.

Image on left is from Samarra Iraq, 5000 BC, image on the rightwas referred to as the ‘Key to Universal Movement’ by the ancestors of the Aztec.

And it was Al’s brother James that found the symbol called the KEY to Universal Movement (swastika) in the ruins of ancient ‘mexico city’.
And maybe we should have a look at what his brother/author James Churchward found in Mexico too?
Ancient mesoamerican cuneiform, known as the Niven Tablets, that disappeared?

Plate next to a digital sky survey of the MILKY WAY…
Is there a much deeper meaning to the plate?
Is the plate a MODEL of the Milky Way from 5000 BC?

Please note the KEYSTONE = 69

How does it match up with the ARCH and KEYSTONE found in St. Louis?

Construction of the arch started on February 12, 1963 and was completed on October 28, 1965.

Interesting ‘numbers’ used in its ARKitecture.

The date of completion caught my eye immediately.

Oct. 28/1965 … or …  10/28/1965

Remove the notation…

Then remove the CODE I stumbled and bumbled upon 11258, connecting the Tarot/Freemason/Christian/Egyptian mysteries CODE found on CARD X.
BTW CARD X solves X, all of ’em.

The CODE on CARD X is 11258.
Remove those numbers from the date of completion of the GATEWAY between EAST and WEST.

Date with no notation: 10281965 … remove the CODE 11258 … remainder 096

What do we do with the 0?
Place it at the beginning of the CODE 11258, or we could ignore it.

0, 1, 1, 2, ?, 5, 8 = fibonacci and phi and golden concepts…ask MacDonalds about the Golden Arch shaped like an ‘M’ or is it a W, E or 3?
? = the missing ‘3’ in the above CODE?
(yes ‘3’ is placed at the center of the wheel)

But what do we do with the 96?
Read from RIGHT to LEFT?
96 = 69 = KEYSTONE

Thus we place 69 = KEYSTONE

Oct. 28/1965 is the date of completion when the KEYSTONE on the St. Louis Gateway Arch was put into place.


KEYSTONE = ARROW shape and story:

The above KEYSTONE SHAPE was put into place on Oct. 28/1965, connecting the TWO halves of the ARCH. (connecting north and south)
Just a coincidence they chose this date to complete the Royal Arch/ARK?

St.Louis Gateway Arch, October 28, 1965, setting the KEYSTONE = 69


So my next question would be, what are the FREEMASONS/NASA doing on the MOON?

69 = Cancer = only astrological sign aSSigned the MOON.
the only one…

….and the story continues with the Crab Nebula in the constellation Taurus going supernova in 1054 A.D.?

Can’t make this shit up folks…it has already been written.


Swastika is the KEY to Universal Movement
“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”