216 and the Shemhamphorash

Originally posted by hawk123

www.bobnancy.com…

Regarding the use of 432 Hz as a standard for tuning, at the Rose Lyre Workshop our instruments are designed to perform well at either 432 Hz or 440 Hz and we tune them according to the wishes of our customers, although our instruments tend “feel better” at 432 Hz. At this time if one wants to play music “out in the world” with other musicians, one must be able to play at 440 Hz. We recommend that musicians use a new design of electronic tuners that allow calibration to any concert pitch standard, including 432 Hz, so they can play with anyone they choose to and still play in tune.

Conclusion: With 432 Hz you feel better and healthier

And 216 is 1/2 of 432.
The 216 digit code letter name connected to the archetypal God is widely known and called the Shemhamphorash.

216 = 9

The true 216-digits sequence is (Naturalis Veritas, the end of the history, Massimo Nardotto, 2007):

1 1 2 3 5 8 4 3 7 1 8 9 8 8 7 6 4 1 5 6 2 8 1 9 2 2 4 6 1 7 8 6 5 2 7 9 7 7 5 3 8 2 1 3 4 7 2 9 3 3 6 9 6 6 3 9 3 3 6 9 6 6 3 9 3 3 6 9 6 6 3 9 4 4 8 3 2 5 7 3 1 4 5 9 5 5 1 6 7 4 2 6 8 5 4 9 5 5 1 6 7 4 2 6 8 5 4 9 4 4 8 3 2 5 7 3 1 4 5 9 6 6 3 9 3 3 6 9 6 6 3 9 3 3 6 9 6 6 3 9 3 3 6 9 7 7 5 3 8 2 1 3 4 7 2 9 2 2 4 6 1 7 8 6 5 2 7 9 8 8 7 6 4 1 5 6 2 8 1 9 1 1 2 3 5 8 4 3 7 1 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

Notice all the 9s at the end of the sequence.

The string of 9s are either the source or the goal of our collective jouney….

Well within that 216 letter coded name of ‘god’ is the Fibonacci sequence embedded.
Do you see it?

The first 24 numbers of the Fibonacci series are in blue and this is the sequence that repeats.
Those 24 numbers repeat IF you reduce the Fibonacci numbers always to a single digit.

The numbers that repeat in red indicate the beginning of a new series of the original 24 Fib numbers, BUT now you must multiply those ‘reduced’ Fibonacci 24 (1 1 2 3 5 8 4 3 7 1 8 9 8 8 7 6 4 1 5 6 2 8 1 9) by the factor indicated.

i.e.

1 x 2 = 2
1 x 2 = 2
2 x 2 = 4
3 x 2 = 6
5 X 2 = 10 = 1

8 x 2 = 16 = 7
4 x 2 = 8
3 x 2 = 6
7 X 2 = 14 = 5

2 2 4 6 1 7 8 6 5 ….

The results above that we see from multiplying by a factor of 2, fits the pattern of the 216 letter name of god.

Clues to breaking the Code of the Shemhamphorash using the Fibonacci sequence.
The first 216 digits of the Fibonacci sequence can be found online, not that you need to reduce the first 216 numbers in the series. The pattern will become clear long before that…

1/ 216/9 = 24
2/ the Fibonacci sequence actually repeats every 24 digits, to infinity….
3/ just remember to always keep reducing to a single digit until you have identified the 24 digit Fibonacci sequence that repeats itself to infinity…you are ready to move on to clue/step 4.
4/ multiply the 24 digit Fibonacci sequence indicated by the numbers that start each 24 digit series, and keep reducing to a single digit.

Follow?

nein?
jah?
jain?

Vedic math and Jain can help with understanding 24.
http://www.jainmathemagics.com/page/2/default.asp

Dimensional Cross of the Prime Numbers, that 24 Cracks the Code, via the powerful tool of Symmetry. 
What this means is that the Prime Numbers that you know of, do exist in symmetry, but you have been told mathematical distortions, for thousands of years, that it is a nonsense sequence with no pattern. Why? Because it is a StarGate.

24 is a Time Code.

We wear it on our watches and have no real understanding of what is looking us daily in the face.

Comments or confusions welcome.

namaste

Raphael

About these ads

26 thoughts on “216 and the Shemhamphorash

  1. A proposito del numero Pi e dei casi particolari che precedono (frequenze del sole e della luna) e che seguono, si può ricordare che un certo Max fu il protagonista del Film Pi di Darren Aronofsky (1998), il quale utilizzò una sequenza di 216 cifre per spiegare e prevedere il comportamento dei mercati finanziari.

    Senza voler entrare nella fantascienza, il matrimonio tra scienza e religione si può cogliere anche dai casi particolari che caratterizzano la seguente operazione matematica denominata STAR.

    STAR è un’operazione numerica non ancora approvata dalla comunità scientifica, ed introdotta per la prima volta da nel 2004 (Puncum Temporis, Massimo Nardotto).

    Si dice che un numero naturale x è STAR di un numero naturale y quando x è differente da y ed il risultato numerico della funzione combinatoria xy + yx + xx + yy – 4 è costante per ogni coppia tale per cui x + y sia costante (xx rapprensenta il numero dato dall’accoppiamento di due x uno di seguito all’altro e non il quadrato di x, cosi come xy rappresenta il numero dato dall’accoppiamento di y di seguito ad x e non il prodotto di x ed y).

    È così che in un sistema bipolare in equilibrio si può verificare che per ogni x = 9 + n, in corrispondenza di ogni y = 9 – n, con n naturale inferiore o uguale a 9, la funzione x STAR y da costantemente 2012 come risultato quando x + y = 18.
    Per esempio :
    • x = 5 e y = 13 ; 5 + 13 = 18 ; 5 star 13 = 55 + 1313 + 513 + 135 – 4 = 2012.
    • x = 17 e y = 1 ; 17 + 1 = 18 ; 17 star 1 = 1717 + 11 + 171 + 117 – 4 = 2012.
    • x = 18 e y = 0 ; 18 + 0 = 18 ; 18 star 0 = 1818 + 00 + 180 + 018 – 4 = 2012.
    • x = 10 e y = 8 ; 10 + 8 = 18 ; 10 star 8 = 1010 + 88 + 108 + 810 – 4 = 2012.

    Per x = y = 9, essendo ogni membro uguale a se stesso, la funzione STAR non sottrae il valore 4 alla somma xx + xy + yy + yx, quanto il risultato di F12 – (360 – 96 + 2Pi)/Pi. F12 è il dodicesimo elemento della sequenza di Fibonacci (144) e Pi è razionale come spiegato di seguito.

    Si può verificare che :
    • x = y = 9 ; x + y = 18 ; 9 star 9 = 99 + 99 + 99 + 99 – 144 + 86 = 338.

    Allo stesso modo si puo verificare che per qualsiasi x = 5 + n in corrispondenza di qualsiasi y = 5 – n, con n naturale inferiore a 5, la funzione x STAR y da sempre 216 per x + y = 10.

    Per esempio :
    • x = 6 et y = 4 ; 6 + 4 = 10 ; 6 star 4 = 66 + 44 + 64 + 46 – 4 = 216.
    • x = 9 et y = 1 ; 9 + 1 = 10 ; 9 star 1 = 99 + 11 + 91 + 19 – 4 = 216.

    In corrispondenza a x = y = 5, la funzione STAR diventa F12 + (360 – 96 + 2Pi)/Pi – xx + xy + yy + yx ed ha come risultato x + y :
    • x = y = 5 ; x + y = 10 ; 5 star 5 = 144 + 86 – 55 – 55 – 55 – 55 = 10.

    L’autore della funzione STAR non fornisce una dimostrazione matematica. Propone tuttavia di verificare le singolarità seguenti rispetto ai numeri 2012 e 216, al fine di autentificare la scoperta (Tempus Maximus, Massimo Nardotto, 2007).
    • Sia Pi greco uguale al limite massimo della costante d’Archimede per un poligono di 96 lati (22/7). Siano n et c rispettivamente uguali alla somma delle lettere che compongono nome e cognome dell’autore utilizzando il valore numerico dei caratteri nel linguaggio T9 (38 e 46). Si può verificare che Pi*(n+c)+n*c è uguale a 2012.
    • Sia F24 il 24esimo elemento della sequenza di Fibonacci (46368) e 12F il quadrato di 360-96 (69696). In corrispondenza del valore precedente di Pi, 2012 è il risultato di F24-(12F+2Pi)/(Pi/2).

  2. translation from above, using google…

    About Pi and the number of cases before (frequency of sun and moon) and below, you may recall that a certain Max was the protagonist of the film Pi Darren Aronofsky (1998), who used a sequence of 216 figures to explain and predict the behavior of financial markets.

    Without wishing to enter in fiction, the marriage between science and religion can also seize the cases that characterize the following mathematical operation known as STAR.

    STAR is a digital not yet approved by the scientific community, and introduced for the first time in 2004 (Puncum Temporis Massimo Nardotto).

    It is said that a natural STAR x is a number of natural y when x is different from y and the numerical result of the function combinatorial xx yy xy yx – 4 is constant for each pair such that xy is constant (xx rapprensenta the number given dall’accoppiamento two x one to follow, not the square of x, as well as xy is the number of y dall’accoppiamento given below to xe not the product of x and y).

    Thus in a bipolar system in balance you can verify that for each x n = 9, at each y = 9 – n, with no natural or less 9, the function y x STAR steadily from 2012 when as a result xy = 18.
    For example:
    • x and y = 5 = 13; 5 13 = 18; 5 star 13 = 55 1313 513 135 – 4 = 2012.
    • x and y = 17 = 1; 17 1 = 18; 17 star 1 = 1717 11 171 117 – 4 = 2012.
    • x = 18 and y = 0; 18 0 = 18; 18 star 0 = 1818 00 180 018 – 4 = 2012.
    • x = 10 and y = 8, 10 8 = 18; 10 star 8 = 1010 88 108 810 – 4 = 2012.

    For x = y = 9, as every member equal to himself, the STAR not absolve the value 4 to sum xx yy xy yx, as the result of F12 – (360 – 96 2PI) / Pi. F12 is the twelfth element of the Fibonacci sequence (144) and Pi is rational as explained below.

    You can check that:
    • x = y = 9; xy = 18; 9 star 9 = 99 99 99 99 – 144 86 = 338.

    Likewise, you can verify that for any x n = 5 at any of y = 5 – n, with n natural less than 5 x STAR function y always 216 for xy = 10.

    For example:
    • x and y = 6 = 4 6 4 = 10; 6 star 4 = 66 44 64 46 – 4 = 216.
    • x and y = 9 = 1 9 1 = 10 9 = 1 star 99 11 91 19 – 4 = 216.

    Under ax = y = 5, STAR becomes the F12 (360 – 96 2PI) / Pi – xx yy xy yx and as a result xy:
    • x = y = 5; xy = 10; 5 star 5 = 144 86 – 55 – 55 – 55 – 55 = 10.

    The author of the STAR function does not provide a mathematical proof. However, proposes to check the singularity following numbers compared with 2012 and 216 in order to authenticated discovery (Tempus Maximus, Maximus Nardotto, 2007).
    • Both Pi greek equal to the maximum limit of the constant Archimedean for a 96-sided polygon (22 / 7). Let n et c respectively equal to the sum of the letters that make up the name and surname of the author using the numerical value of the characters in the language T9 (38 and 46). You can verify that Pi * (nc) n * c is equal to 2012.
    • Both the F24 element 24esimo Fibonacci sequence (46,368) and 12F square of 360-96 (69696). Under the previous value of Pi, 2012 is the result of F24-(12F 2PI) / (Pi / 2).

  3. By the time we arrive at 999999 we’re looking at overunity from a growth one step up, I feel. The ‘world’ uses only 124875. 396 is the ethereal third string. See marko RODINS work. Interesting stuff, thanks for the sharing

  4. My pleasure is there any way we could have a chat?

    I am very interested in the same things you are though I am sure you are far ahead and I may have nothing new to offer as I have not looked sideways too much I am afraid.

    This is a link to Part 1 of a paper I am working on – https://trello-attachments.s3.amazonaws.com/4f1fe6fdc7efa71561036665/4f20061a25082d517209c8fb/ogXND8IWOH1S9cyYOg5Dk3xXaH0x/Mod_9_Paper_Part_1.pdf

    Part 2 is nearly finished, needs a thorough edit!

    I would really value your feedback
    Thanks
    Respectfully
    Anthony

    • Anthony I appreciate you sending me your MOD 9 work.
      Have you sent Marko or Randy copies?
      Those fellas are more well versed in MOD 9 than I am.
      I know Marko is very approachable.

      My strength is in noticing ‘patterns’.
      That is why I contacted Marko initially because I noticed my patterns fit his.
      Sure we can talk.

      namaste

      • Yes, been working a lot with Randy on this.
        I think / hope I have helped his research.
        Are you US based?
        You can get me on skype as harmonic1969
        Plichta’s book is fantastic.
        Understanding the archetype of the Numbers 1 2 3 & 4 is what it’s all about.
        I think with a little help from people like yourself, 2012 can really be an apocalypse in the true sense of the word.
        Proving that numbers are real and that there is an architect may well be the revelation.
        I am probably more a purist in terms of Mod 9, Randy and Marko are into their coils and I get a bit lost in there to be honest!
        Everything i do has to be exceptionally simple or forget it!
        Anyway, thanks for your timely response.
        Best
        Ant

      • Understanding the archetype of the Numbers 1 2 3 & 4 is what it’s all about.

        Interesting back to the archetype of ’4′ that sets the stage.
        Without a doubt Anthony numbers are real and aLIvE.

        Is Plichta’s book available in English?
        thanks for the skype invite…

        namaste

  5. Oh, also, if there are people who could bring something to the table on this, we need all hands on deck
    I am not into controlling anything so more people who see this the better as far as I am concerned
    Cheers
    Ant

  6. Yes Plichta’s book is available in English – you can get it at amazon.co.uk – am going to re-read it, getting the maths down pat in my head may take a little time to master.
    Looking forward to talking to you sometime soon.
    All the best
    Ant

  7. Hi, sorry, just got this.
    Yes, I’m on facebook, also you can get me on harmonic1969 on skype if you like.
    Will have a look at that link now
    Thanks
    Ant

  8. Hi there – been looking out for you on skype for ages and no show – hope you are well – be great to have a chat if possible

  9. How do you end up with the pair of twos after the first 24-digit sequence? Doesn’t 9+1=10–>1+0=1, not 2? Please explain, this is fascinating and I wanna believe it.

  10. Pingback: H. Harleston Jr. * Teotihuacan Unit 1-5-9-4 * Stem Cell Sequence 1-5-9-13 * George Merkl’s Sumerian Technology | Alternative Thinking 37
  11. Pingback: 11 2 5 8 archives | Alternative Thinking 37

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s